SC junks anew petition vs political dynasties
-A A +ATuesday, February 5, 2013
MANILA -- The Supreme Court will not compel the Senate and the House of Representatives to pass a law that would define “political dynasties” which under the Constitution are prohibited from participating in elections.
This was the decision of the justices after its regular session on Tuesday when it tackled the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Richard Penson, an independent candidate in the senatorial elections this May.
“Penson petition for mandamus on political dynasties denied for same reasons as the Biraogo petition,” said a text message from the SC Public Information Office.
Earlier, the Court denied a similar petition by certain Louis Biraogo asking the SC to order the Comelec to outlaw political dynasties saying the provision is a "non-self-executing provision, requiring as it does the legislative act of Congress to define what 'political dynasties' are and to prescribe the scope and limits of such prohibition."
In his petition, Penson said Congress has yet to pass a measure that would operationalize Section 26, Article II of the Constitution which states "the State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law."
Penson added that Filipinos are still being controlled by political clan alliances composed of the families belonging to the Nationalist People’s Coalition, Lakas, Laban ng Demokratikong Pilipino and the ruling Liberal Party of President Benigno Aquino III. (Virgil Lopez/Sunnex)
Forum rules: Do not use obscenity. Some words have been banned. Stick to the topic. Do not veer away from the discussion. Be coherent and respectful. Do not shout or use CAPITAL LETTERS!

