Reeves: USCIS clarifies immigration eligibility of family of deceased
Sunday, January 23, 2011
IN October 2009, the US Congress made an important and much-needed change to immigration law by passing Section 204(l) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This section of the law allows one to apply for a green card even if the petitioning family member has passed away. In the past, only qualifying widows and widowers of US citizens were provided with the remedy of obtaining permanent resident status when their spouse passed away.
Although Section 204(l) has been in existence for over one year, immigration officials have been slow to adapt to the new law. In January 2011, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released a policy memorandum that provides its officers with clarification regarding who can qualify for immigration benefits under the new law. Below, we discuss some of the highlights.
Have something to report? Tell us in text, photos or videos.
Section 204(l) permits immigration benefits for an applicant who is the beneficiary of a pending or approved family-based petition. Benefits can also flow to the derivative child or spouse of the beneficiary of both family and employment-based petitions, if other eligibility requirements can be satisfied. Examples:
1. If a father petitioned his adult or minor child but he passed away, the child may still immigrate.
2. If a grandmother petitioned her daughter and the daughter passed away, her grandchildren may still qualify for benefits based on her petition.
3. If a company petitioned a father as an employee but he passed away, his children may still qualify for benefits based on the company’s petition.
Other categories of applicants such as asylum seekers, their derivatives, and T and U status derivative beneficiaries may also qualify.
In order to qualify, the immigrant beneficiary must have resided in the United States when the qualifying relative died and must continue to reside in the US on the date of the decision on the pending petition or application. This does not mean that the immigrant must have been physically present on the exact day that their relative passed away. It means that the immigrant must have maintained a residence in the US at the time of the qualifying relative’s death and up until a decision on the pending petition or application.
The statute does not bar someone who was actually abroad when the qualifying relative died from proving that the aspiring immigrant still resides in the United States. This provision may prove useful for individuals who had been living in the US when their family member passed away, but happened to be out of the country on the exact day when their relative passed away.
It is also relevant to note that Section 204(l) does not require the immigrant applicant to show that he or she was, or is, residing here lawfully. The concept of residence pertains to where someone maintained a primary living place, regardless of one’s immigration status.
Derivatives of a qualifying relative qualify for benefits notwithstanding the death of the principal beneficiary (the derivatives’ parent or spouse). The USCIS policy memorandum clarifies the residence requirement on the part of the derivative beneficiaries. According to the guidance, the derivative beneficiaries can benefit if any one of the beneficiaries of a covered petition meets the residence requirement.
In a situation where a company petitions the father/husband in a family and the father/husband passes away, only one of the derivative beneficiaries must meet the residence requirement. Example, suppose the derivative beneficiaries consisted of a wife and three children. Suppose further that only the wife meets the residence requirement, while the three children do not. The USCIS makes clear that as long as one derivative meets the residence requirements of section 204(l), all of the children may immigrate to the same extent that would have been permitted if the father had not died. This provision is a significant benefit to many possible applicants and should be closely considered where multiple derivative beneficiaries are involved.
Reeves & Associates welcomes the recent Section 204(l) clarifications from USCIS. The new law may benefit many immigrant families seeking to reunite despite the death of a loved one. In order to understand whether a particular family or individual can benefit from the new law, a detailed consultation with an experienced law firm is recommended.
Published in the Sun.Star Cebu newspaper on January 24, 2011.
Business
- New iPad now available in Cebu
- Beauty company expects sales surge
- Software piracy reported in CV
- Ng: Facebook offering
- I.Protect: Marked bottles
- CCCI president to focus on SMEs
- UV signs up for telco’s information service
- Firm to sell Acai coffee
- Ships still the cheaper way to travel in country: Cokaliong
- PH software sector grew 37% in 2011






