The DOJ secretary mishandled post-incident damage control. In the first place, he shouldn’t have opened his mouth about a conspiracy he still had to verify
JUSTICE Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II’s handling of the report of an alleged destabilization plot against the Duterte administration provides a case-book study for a news source, especially a public official, on (1) how to avoid that kind of fiasco and (2) what to do afterwards to control damage.
The day after the June 9 press-con in which he alleged the plot, Aguirre said he stressed to the reporters:
- the information was raw;
- he still had to verify the report; and
- he didn’t release the controversial photo; he just “swiftly flashed” the image on his cell-phone.
News reports on the story had more than enough data to support it: names of the alleged plotters, the meeting place, the goals, etc. Aguirre’s announcement of a department order on “case build-up” indicated his suspicion was serious.
But what must have moved the story faster was the discovery by media in the same news cycle that Aguirre’s information was a fake news used earlier by a group supporting President Duterte.
The same photo that Aguirre showed and withdrew in seconds accompanied the web site’s fake news. (The photo was actually taken two years earlier at the Iloilo airport.) He misjudged reporters’ ingenuity in scouring for news material. The expose on the alleged plot was thus exposed as bogus in the same news feed.
His post-incident crisis management tanked because, first, he said he was misquoted. A lame if not silly excuse these days with the built-in cameras and audio recorders in cell-phones. Second, he complained of what he said was an unreported “caveat” that the news material hadn’t been verified yet, which didn’t rule out the bigger aspect of the story, the spurious information.
Just shut up
He shouldn’t have opened his mouth about the plot he still wasn’t sure about. A teaser or appetizer? He should’ve known better: even an off-the-record warning, which he didn’t give, couldn’t stop a juicy story from getting out.
Besides blaming media, he offered excuses which couldn’t offset the fact that it was an authentic retelling of how fake news prompted government action.
But was it fake news?
VETERAN journalist Ninez Cacho-Olivares, writing in the “Tribune,” said DOJ chief Vitaliano Aguirre II didn’t offer fake news.
Aguirre’s order for the justice department to investigate was true. So was, she said, “the fact” that the personalities suspected of helping fueling the Marawi crisis hatched similar plots against other presidents before.
That shows precisely how fake news can be manipulated, covered barely with some fig leaf of legitimate news.
Not the story
Aguirre’s probe order wasn’t the story. The story was the alleged plot that led to the order, which was spurious because the facts were wrong and the photo that “documented” the supposed conspirators’ meeting was bogus. It was even used already as fake news, interestingly by a pro-Duterte website. As to the presence of the “usual suspects,” that didn’t prove conspiracy; a story background maybe but it wasn’t the story. Even Aguirre didn’t raise it, only Oliveres did.
The part that was authentic, the DOJ order, couldn’t hide the fakery, which was the basis for the order and the story’s meat -- and prominently stuck out.
Published in the SunStar Cebu newspaper on June 17, 2017.
Latest issues of SunStar Cebu also available on your mobile phones, laptops, and tablets. Subscribe to our digital editions at epaper.sunstar.com.ph and get a free seven-day trial.