|
To
the undecided
By Isolde Amante
I ENVY your position, for
at least two reasons.
First, because you can make
your decisions in relative peace and quiet,
free from the inanities and filth that passed
for political advertising in these last
three months.
Second, because you represent
a formidable bloc, some 12 percent of the
total number of registered voters, going
by the Social Weather Station’s (SWS)
latest survey from May 1 to 4. That’s
5.1 million votes you can deliver, if all
of you vote—almost the same number
of ballots that made Fidel Ramos president
in 1992.
We who have already decided
whom to support for the presidency can now
only hope for the best and be vigilant in
the days ahead. We have made our vows. The
word “vote” stems from the Latin
“votum” (meaning, a vow or a
wish) and “vovere” (to vow).
You, on the
other hand, just might get to decide the
country’s fortunes in the next six
years. You’ll probably think this
exaggerated, but it isn’t. Your ranks
have more than doubled since the year began:
the SWS reports that from 5.4 percent in
mid-January, you now account for 12 percent.
No wonder
so much has gone into scaring you into voting
for continuity, for example, when one would
be better off voting for change. Considering
how much is riding on your vote today, one
would think it had more than fear to stand
on.
If you do decide to vote
this day, and I certainly hope you do, let
me share this “thinking tool for voters”
published yesterday by the Personnel Management
Association of the Philippines (PMAP)—not
to be confused with the People’s Movement
Against Poverty that helped plunge us into
the disaster also known as the Estrada administration.
PMAP’s scorecard lists
five roles the president of the republic
needs to play:
Navigator-strategist: The
president must demonstrate that he or she
can strategically solve problems and make
the most of opportunities. The candidate
should have offered a clear, detailed plan
to tackle our major problems, among them
the budget deficit, a severe infrastructure
gap, an impending power shortage.
Mobilizer:
The candidate must have succeeded in the
past in managing a complex organization.
Servant-leader:
The man or woman who seeks to be president
must be a good example, display humility
and, as naïve as this may sound, have
good work and study habits.
Captivator:
The candidate must inspire optimism in the
future and trust in the government. He or
she must move the people away from cynicism,
which people often (and disastrously) confuse
with skepticism.
Guardian of
national wealth and the rule of law: Your
choice for the next president should demonstrate
success in fighting corruption, take a clear
stand on controversial issues like population
management and display transparency and
integrity in their public and private lives.
That said, I should admit
that on both occasions I voted for a president,
my candidates lost. Miserably too, trailing
the eventual winners by some three million
votes in 1992 and over seven million votes
in 1998.
Yet because those votes
stemmed from what I believed—not from
what I feared or out of a cynical bid to
cast my lot with whoever was sure of winning—those
were votes I did not regret making. I do
not regret them still.
top
back
to election page
Roco's
medical bulletin
By Dr. Aguido Magdadaro
THE medical
bulletin of Sen. Raul Roco, as explained
by his propagandists, is too simplistic.
Lorna Kapunan, a lawyer, was quoted as saying,
"unlike layman's interpretation, cancer
is not a bad word. Cancer is just descriptive
of an illness, so not necessarily serious."
She went on: "In the case of Senator
Roco, that cancer was found, as the report
shows, to be benign, and has been cured
by the treatment that he was getting."
A kettle found white? Dr. Jaime Galvez-Tan,
a doctor, said, "It was determined
to be benign and unlikely to recur again."
The word cancer means malignant tumor. Cancer
is a malignancy -- a killer disease, always
a bad word, contrary to lawyer Kapunan's
statement. Medical experts do not call cancer
a benign disease.
Prostate cancer
targets the bones, the brain, the lungs,
the liver and other organs in a process
called metastasis.
Bone involvement
accompanied by pain is not a simple complication
of metastatic cancer. It is an advanced
complication. It means osteolytic lesion
or some degree of bone destruction has already
developed.
It can be without
pain, but the presence of pain indicates
serious affliction of nerve receptors on
the surface of the bone, or the nerve itself,
which is not a good sign.
An ordinary
bone fracture requires between two months
(for a child) to six months (for adults)
to heal. Osteolytic lesions caused by metastatic
cancer takes longer time to heal, or rarely
heals at all.
Prostate cancer
is curable if the disease is confined within
the capsules of the gland. Once it spreads
and invades other tissues outside the capsule,
it assumes a different story.
Roco's doctors
say that his metastatic bone lesion has
healed with the use of "intelligent
medicine" in a matter of two weeks
of treatment in the United States.
To my medical
mind, this is too good to be true, but I
would like to hear more about this "magic"
medicine, perhaps it will help heal ordinary
bone fractures that require months to heal.
Roco's spokespersons
are vague, defensive and opening more questions
than giving intelligent answers with their
press statements about his "benign
cancer" which healed in two weeks.
Does the discerning
public not deserve a better and more honest
explanation?
top
back
to election page
-----
Original Message -----
From: "Mike Farrell"
<firstsgtmike@hotmail.com>
Subject: P20, P10 notes
THERE is only
one Filipino joke, the rest of the stories
are all true. "BSP Currency Operations
Unit manager 1 Remedios L. Lozano was asked
to comment on reports that several politicians
are allegedly withdrawing millions of pesos
in P20 and P10 notes from different commercial
banks." Did anyone ask why a million
pesos in P10 and P20 denominations were
needed, and where they were going?
Do you think
it might have any relationship to charges
of vote buying?
Why is it that
certain politicians only pay their debts
with P10 and P20 notes during election (vote-buying)
time, and during the rest of the months
use P1000, and P500 and checks to pay their
debts? Duh?
top
back
to election page
|