|
Juan Mercado
October 13, 2004
Hunger-and building an overdue ark
"From food are born all creatures
that live on earth. Afterwards, they live on food. And when they
die, they return to food."
- The Upanishads
This ancient Indian text is reflected
in Social Weather Station's (SWS) latest survey. Among other things,
SWS found: Filipinos who had nothing to eat once a day - at least
once in the last three months, rose to 15 percent - the highest
since March 2001.
Hunger is most severe in Mindanao (23
percent). Metro Manila and the Visayas followed (13 percent), then
Luzon (11 percent).
Except for the Visayas, hunger spread in all areas. Luzon and National
Capital Region reported "new record highs."
"These are people of the broken
plough, who bear the face of hunger," an Asian writer notes.
"Men, women and children for whom it is almost too late."
Statistics rarely tell how chronic
hidden hunger shatters lives and hopes. But periodic surveys spotlight
the newest contours.
They permit comparison over time.
They can help strip away tunnel vision.
Critical issues are often jammed within a narrow perspective: this
administration's lifespan and that of the previous regime.
Hunger is rooted in our troubled past.
And it will persist in an equally troubled future. At the rate nutrition
improved over 11 years, "it will take half a century before
we can eradicate malnutrition," wailed the fifth of six previous
national nutrition surveys.
Conducted every five years, the sixth
was released July. People then were transfixed on Iraqi terrorist
hostage Angelo de la Cruz. But the new survey is more significant
than one freed OFW hostage, Inquirer noted in "Invisble Hostages."
"More than 225 kids, below five,
die every day due to preventable diseases stemming from malnutrition,"
the paper said. "It's like loading a jumbo jet daily with 225
toddlers, for a year, then crashing them into Batasan."
Four out of 10 pregnant women today
are anemic. About the same number of mothers, who breastfed, are
afflicted. "These dry statistics document a lethal cycle: the
ill-fed give birth to wizened infants who, in their turn, will mother
a generation of dwarfed babies."
Scrawny mothers often have premature
babies who by age three will be stunted. Poor nutrition stunts about
half (47 percent) of kids in Negros Occidental and Northern Samar,
the 5th survey found.
Ill-fed kids will be deprived from
"10 to 14 in intelligence quotients." Scientists call
this "cognitive deficits," Asian Development Bank noted.
That's mental capacity, as jokers put, "missing a few buttons
on remote control."
The administration, meanwhile, floats
a plan to distribute monthly P1.2 billion worth of food coupons
to five million hungry families. Food stamps, targeted on the poor,
worked in other countries. Here, a brawl brews. If funded and if
politicians get a say in distribution, that guarantees failure.
Food stamps are band-aid. Needed are
long-range policies that focus on basic questions. Who puts food
on our tables? And how can they be helped?
Food is produced by farmers, who often
till small slivers of land, and those who fish in our depleted waters.
"The people we ask to do this
daunting job are the small (producers)," the late national
scientist Dioscoro Umali told a United Nations Commission. "It
is on the backs of these frail men and women, often cut off from
mainstream programs, that we strap the task of producing our food.
The peasant...has become the pack horse of civilization."
If there's to be an ark before the
deluge, policies that empower producers must be swiftly adopted.
These would range from credit, research, extension, to education,
health and agrarian reform, among others.
Technology offers some answers. Unless
matched with measures that increase incomes, elaborate programs
or new tools avail for nothing. Increased food stocks are meaningless
to a family that cannot buy it.
Unlocking the human potential remains
the crucial question. This is a tension-filled issue. The poor today
see that benefits are creamed off by elites. Skewed laws and structures
block them off from making decisions that allocate resources.
As a result, they do not produce or
conserve ecosystems. Why should they? They have no stake in merely
redistributing hunger and penury.
Thanks to modern media, the poor see
that their deprivation, stunted lives and premature graves are not
inevitable. This knowledge unlocks aspirations of tremendous force.
Demands for long-postponed reform of
a social order that vests a franchise on longer fuller lives in
the affluent will erupt. "A poor and hungry people have nothing
to lose by embracing strange causes," warns the Overseas Development
Council.
Easing of penury is not a luxury. It
is a condition of our survival as a human community. We should have
no illusions that our safety margins are thinning.
"If your pour yourself out for
the hungry, you shall raise up the foundation of many generations,"
the Sacred Writers tell us. "And you will be called...restorer
of paths to dwell in."
(e-mail: juan_mercado@
pacific.net.ph)
|