Back to homepage
| Bacolod | Baguio | Cebu | Cagayan de Oro | Davao | Dumaguete | GenSan | Iloilo | Manila | Pampanga | Pangasinan | Zamboanga |

  Local News
Politics may block MCWD water deal
Kris confession draws support
Brownouts due to ‘glitches’
New power rates okayed, to relieve private suppliers
Bill on libel suit venue filed
MCWD gets civil service award today, amid supply controversy
Cop gets off hook after cleaning up lady fiscal’s office
Mayor Gullas starts meeting rival camp
Cops’ intensive drive causes prices of illegal drugs to rise
Empower women in agriculture: council
Man ‘abducts’ former lover
Micame: New Ouano road to attract investors

Friday, September 26, 2003
Bill on libel suit venue filed
By Karlon N. Rama

A SINGLE-PAGE house bill to resolve the question of where libel cases against journalists can be filed was passed for congressional discussion and approval yesterday.
The bill mandates that libel cases can only be filed in the city or province where the offending publication or media outlet operates.

However, while merely serving as an addendum to the Revised Penal Code’s provision on libel, the bill, sponsored by Rep. Raul del Mar (Cebu City, north), may finally put an end to the legal oppression and harassment journalists have been facing for a long time now.

Under current rules, a person stung by a negative news report or commentary can file a libel case against a journalist in the Regional Trial Court of the place where he (offended party) resides or where he works, regardless of where the alleged libel was committed.

So if the subject of the article is an official based in Manila, he can file his case there. This burdens journalists who don’t live in Manila to go to the capital for the hearings.

While the complainant can opt to file the charge in the place where the alleged libel is committed, the offended party usually does not exercise that option.

“The prevailing legal rules on venue thus places community journalists and local broadcasters in a situation where they have to answer complaints or charges filed, rightly or wrongly, in remote or distant places, deliberately filed away from their place of business or work,” del Mar said in the explanatory note attached to the proposal.

“In this context, the element of oppression is there. The toll of inconvenience, financial or otherwise, is often more onerous and burdensome than the penalty or fine prescribed by the law.
This may even lead to a miscarriage of justice in cases where the accused or defendant fails to appear because of distance and travel constraints,” he said.

The passing of the proposal, designated as house bill 6440, was timely as it coincided with the Press Freedom Week celebrations here in Cebu.

(September 26, 2003 issue)

Write letter to the editor. Click here.

Join the Sun.Star message board. Click here.




ENETWORK HEADLINE
Poverty woes top new peace adviser's focus

ENETWORK NEWS
Lakas won't back Joey, Kris not the reason
Politics may block MCWD water deal
Unknown men trailing us, activists claim


[ return to top ] [ home ]



Sun.Star Network Online

LOCAL NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFESTYLE
FEATURE

SUPERBALITA
WEEKEND

Classified Power Ads

Past Issues