Back to homepage
| Bacolod | Baguio | Cagayan de Oro | Cebu | Davao | Dumaguete | General Santos | Iloilo | Manila | Pampanga | Pangasinan | Zamboanga |

  Opinion
Seares: Covering the judiciary - issues and concerns
Wenceslao: Shocking decision
Mongaya: Tommy-Alvin verbal exchange
Talk back: No misrepresentation
Speak out: Journalistic gunslinger

Thursday, April 22, 2004
Talk back: No misrepresentation
By Gloria Lastimosa- Dalawampu
Legal Counsel Inchemcoat Phil., Inc


This is a reaction to the paid advertisement of Nicholas Wu and Intelchem Phil., Inc. (IPI), which imputed to my client, Inchemcoat Phil., Inc. (Inchem), the commission of illegal business transactions.

We hope this reaction is published to correct whatever distorted opinions on Inchem the public may have because of the unfounded accusations of Nicolas Wu and IPI.

The “Notice to the Public” that came out in the April 5, 2004 issue of Sun.Star Cebu accused Inchem of misrepresenting itself as a “sister company” of IPI and of allegedly securing credit terms with IPI’s suppliers and creditors, or special accommodation from IPI’s business partners.

Nicholas Wu and/or IPI also maliciously accused Inchem of allegedly spreading rumors that IPI is closing its business so Inchem can take over IPI’s customers.

Nicholas Wu and/or IPI knew very well that these are false, baseless and malicious accusations. Inchem has, at all times, been conducting itself as a legitimate business company in sound, healthy and friendly competition with other companies, including but not limited to IPI.

In the “Notice,” Nicholas Wu and/or IPI explicitly pointed their finger at Inchem. Consequently, Sun.Star readers are made to believe Inchem is guilty of certain offenses. The words used in the publication are sufficient to impeach Inchem’s honesty, virtue, and reputation and were clearly meant to put Inchem to public ridicule.

Definitely, this is libel.

Nichaolas Wu and/or IPI know very well that Inchem did not commit any act of misrepresentation as imputed in the publication. But if they can present solid proof, Inchem itself will weed the employee concerned out of the company.

In this connection, we demand that Nicholas Wu and/or IPI present to us sufficient and solid evidence to bolster their accusations. If they fail to do so within five days, we shall consider their paid advertisement as part of their sinister design to force Inchem to pull its business out of the Philippines, thereby leaving them conveniently transacting business without any competitor.

(April 22, 2004 issue)

Write letter to the editor. Click here.
Join the Sun.Star message board. Click here.




ENETWORK HEADLINE
Ecleo released, set to leave for Manila

ENETWORK NEWS
Next prexy must possess '3Cs': CBCP
Guv suspended even if reelected: DILG
MILF participates in poll process: AFP


[return to top] [home] [network page]






Sun.Star Network Online

LOCAL NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFESTYLE
FEATURE

SUPERBALITA
WEEKEND

Classified Power Ads

Past Issues

Click to find out more

I © Copyright 2002 - 2004 Sun.Star Publishing, Inc. I Contact the website at online_desk@sunstar.com.ph I