Back to homepage
| Bacolod | Baguio | Cagayan de Oro | Cebu | Davao | Dumaguete | General Santos | Iloilo | Manila | Pampanga | Pangasinan | Zamboanga |

  Local News
Alay Lakad show stopped; participants offended by 'obscene' show
26 drug syndicates in Central Visayas
Dumpsite sharing among towns ‘cheaper’
Cebuano mutineer hopes to live normal life again
When should Mandaue hold its Charter Day?
SC favors dismissal of penalty against Castro
College scholarships ready for children, siblings of OFWs
Work on north coastal road study, design right on schedule: DPWH
Cebuano seamen worry over US policy to ban them from leaving boats
'Foul' food served at Cebu City jail

Monday, September 20, 2004
SC favors dismissal of penalty against Castro

THE graft case filed against Acting Talisay City Prosecutor Mary Ann Castro for allegedly receiving bribe money in relation to the Nanan Gimenez drug case has suffered yet another setback.

The Supreme Court recently junked the Office of the Solicitor General’s (OSG) petition to review an earlier ruling of the Court of Appeals (CA) canceling Castro’s administrative penalty.

Castro was slapped with a three-month suspension and was charged with bribery by the Office of the Ombudsman-Visayas.

The High Tribunal, in an Aug. 14 notice signed by Assistant Division Clerk of Court Lucita Soriano, dismissed the July 20 petition for certiorari of the OSG on Castro’s case.

The petition reportedly did not come with a written declaration that no similar case has been filed in another venue as well as a written explanation on why copies of the petition were not served personally to Castro.

Sources from the anti-graft office, however, believe the dismissal is not final and that the matter can still be re-filed after some changes.

“That dismissal is merely because of a technicality. The Supreme Court (SC) is yet to rule on the matter based on merit,” an anti-graft official said.

Castro, for her part, lauded the dismissal and hoped it will eventually become final and executory.
In its 73-page petition for review dated July 20, the OSG asked the SC to reverse the CA ruling, saying it erred in handing the decision.

The petition also stated that the ruling reduces the anti-graft office from an elite graft-busting unit to a “toothless tiger” through its continuous adoption of a “passing and marginal statement.”

The OSG also argued that the CA merely quoted something said in passing the SC’s Tapiador vs. the Office of the Ombudsman ruling when it dismissed Castro’s bribery case last April.

Based on that, the OSG said the CA ruled that the anti-graft office cannot sanction Castro because its authority is merely to recommend penalties, not impose them.

The anti-graft office slapped Castro with the sanctions after she admitted having received a visit from lawyer Gines Abellana at the height of the Hong Kong Triad case.

She said Abellana offered her P10,000 in exchange for not opposing the bail application of Gimenez. KNR

(September 20, 2004 issue)
Write letter to the editor.Click here.
Join the Sun.Star message board.Click here.




ENETWORK HEADLINE
Alay Lakad show stopped: 'obscene'

ENETWORK NEWS
Social fund for pro-poor projects: Arroyo aide
Vidal challenges media: Stand up for what is true
Arrest of rebel 'questionable', militants say


[return to top] [home] [network page]



Sun.Star Network Online

LOCAL NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFESTYLE
FEATURE

SUPERBALITA
WEEKEND

Classified Power Ads

Past Issues



I © Copyright 2002 - 2004 Sun.Star Publishing, Inc. I Contact the website at online_desk@sunstar.com.ph I