Back to homepage
| Bacolod | Baguio | Cagayan de Oro | Cebu | Davao | Dumaguete | General Santos | Iloilo | Manila | Pampanga | Pangasinan | Zamboanga |
Sun+Stars E-Magazine

Google
Web
www.sunstar.com.ph

  Local News
Tomas order overturns Glo’s
Summary killings take another victim
Fil-Am in US convicted of child abuse and sex with boys
Police note rash of theft cases at SRP
No consensus on Myanmar
Fiscal Castro suspended
27 cops lose several days’ salary for going Awol, sleeping on the job
Mandaue operators stage rally
Ex-cop arrested for possessing drugs
Lapu City ignores folk’s opposition
Espinoza: NTC advisory


Tuesday, April 12, 2005
Fiscal Castro suspended

PROSECUTOR Mary Ann Castro will leave for Manila today to verify reports that the anti-graft court has issued a six-month preventive suspension against her.

If necessary, she will file a motion for reconsideration. “I will fight it. They can’t do this to me,” she said.

Castro was the acting Talisay City prosecutor until former Commission on Elections 7 legal officer Marshall Rubia was sworn in for the position yesterday. She will be returning to her old job as assistant city prosecutor of Cebu City.

The suspension order is reportedly related to the P10,000 bribe scandal in 2002 that involved her, lawyer Gines Abellana and drug suspect Giovannie “Nanan” Gimenez.

The Office of the Ombudsman-Visayas, in May 23, 2003, found Castro administratively liable for misconduct and ordered her suspended for three months for allegedly receiving the money Abellana offered her in exchange for “going easy” on the motion for bail Gimenez filed.

Ombudsman Director Virginia Santiago, in a separate order, charged her criminally with violating the anti-graft law before the Sandiganbayan.The Court of Appeals nullified the anti-graft office’s penalty suspension after Castro filed a petition for certiorari that cited how, based on the Tapiador ruling, the Office of the Ombudsman does not have the authority to suspend officials beyond a month. So the order against her was not final and executory.

The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) has contested the appellate court’s ruling, saying the Tapiador ruling was merely something the High Tribunal said in passing and, so, does not have the legal value of jurisprudence.

In the meantime, while the OSG and the appellate court are threshing out the issues in the administrative proceeding, the Sandigan-bayan gave the criminal component due course. (JECT of Superbalita/With KNR)

(April 12, 2005 issue)
Write letter to the editor.Click here.
Join the Sun.Star message board.Click here.




ENETWORK HEADLINE
Mayor road closure order overturns Arroyo's

ENETWORK NEWS
Pinoys believe RP still in crisis: survey
1T residents flee homes due to bomb scare
Conflict with GSIS prods hospital to end deal


[return to top] [home] [network page]



Sun.Star Network Online

LOCAL NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFESTYLE
FEATURE

SUPERBALITA
WEEKEND

Classified Power Ads

Past Issues



I © Copyright 2002 - 2005 Sun.Star Publishing, Inc. I Contact the website at onlinedeskatsunstardotcomdotph I