Back to homepage
| Bacolod | Baguio | Cagayan de Oro | Cebu | Davao | Dumaguete | General Santos | Iloilo | Manila | Pampanga |Pangasinan | Zamboanga |
 
 
 
 

Google
Web
www.sunstar.com.ph

  Opinion
Editorial: Sona minus the crisis
Malilong: Reaping what she sowed
Wenceslao: Sona and those abstractions
Nalzaro: Is cha-cha the solution?
Barrita: Cell phone
Talk back: Custom collector’s ‘threat’
Talk back: Plan to secede


Wednesday, July 27, 2005
Talk back: Plan to secede
By Vincent 'Bentong' S. Isles
Lorega-San Miguel, Cebu City


In the July 22, 2005 column of Riel Micame, he equated the secession of the Visayas from the Philippine Republic with that of the reorganization of local political subdivisions.

Mr. Micame seems to know intuitively that Cebuanos do not like the creation of new political subdivisions, especially if it looks like it would benefit (and it usually does) the ruling families.

Sugbuak is almost dead by now, we have denied congressional district status to Mandaue City, and even the conversion of Talisay into a city has been questioned.

But equating secession and the creation of new political subdivisions only results to confusion.

By doing so, Mr. Micame is robbing the Cebuanos of the chance to seriously consider the secession of Cebu (or the whole of the Visayas) from the Republic of the Philippines.

What is the fundamental difference between secession and the reorganization of political boundaries?

One is a right enjoyed by all people; the other is a privilege that can be denied by the central authority.

It is true that secession is an extra-constitutional act. No provision in our Constitution explicitly states that our people have the right to secede.

But the first organic article of the Constitution says thus: “The Philippines is a democratic and republican state. Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them.”

What we must understand is this: that the state governs by the consent of those governed.

If we want to withdraw our support from this Manila-centered, internally imperialistic government we now know as the Republic of the Philippines, we can.

If the governors of the Visayas want to organize a separate republic, they can.

There is no legitimate reason for preventing people from having the government of their choice, even if their choice is a poor one. Government is legitimate only to the extent that it exists by the consent of the governed.

If Mr. Micame is really for Cebu, he should write not only against those for the breakup of Cebu but also against those who do not want Cebu to secede.

Or, at the very least, distinguish between the two groups.

(July 27, 2005 issue)
Write letter to the editor.Click here.
Join the Sun.Star message board.Click here.




ENETWORK HEADLINE
Senators out to kill Cha-cha

ENETWORK NEWS
Swift approval of Arroyo impeachment rules sought
Oro traders back N. Mindanao federal state
Crippled robber moved to Cebu City jail


[return to top] [home] [network page]






Sun.Star Network Online

LOCAL NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFESTYLE
FEATURE

SUPERBALITA
WEEKEND

Classified Power Ads

Past Issues



I © Copyright 2002 - 2005 Sun.Star Publishing, Inc. I Contact the website at onlinedeskatsunstardotcomdotph I