Back to homepage
| Bacolod | Baguio | Cagayan de Oro | Cebu | Davao | Dumaguete | General Santos | Iloilo | Manila | Pampanga | Pangasinan | Zamboanga |
 
 
 
 

Google
Web
www.sunstar.com.ph

  Business
Finance dept. nixes move to defer e-VAT
RP firms don’t feel compelled to be socially accountable
Computer software to improve local governance, dev’t planning
CCCI to give credit investigation course
Observance of procedural rules
Batuhan: Drowning in a sea of numbers
Cebu-based welder bags `highest’ category in nat’l award


Saturday, September 03, 2005
Observance of procedural rules
By Dominador A. Almirante
Labor case digest


From the decision of a panel of voluntary arbitrators of the National Conciliation and Mediation Board (NCMB), petitioner United Pulp and Paper Co. Inc. filed with the Court of Appeals a petition for review under Rule 43 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended.

The Appellate Court dismissed the petition outright for being insufficient in form because the verification and certification of non-forum shopping was signed only by counsel, there was inadequate affidavit of service and there was no explanation on the failure to effect personal service of petition. United Pulp assailed the resolution for dismissing the petition on mere technicalities. Did the Court of Appeals err?

Ruling: No.

In Kowloon House/Willy Ng vs. Hon. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 140024, June 18, 2003 at 4-5 Favila vs. Second Division, 308 SCRA 303 (1999) and CIR vs. CA, 351 SCRA 436 (2001), we held that “rules of procedure exist for a purpose, and to disregard such rules in the guise of liberal construction would be to defeat such purpose.

Procedural rules are not to be disdained as mere technicalities. They may not be ignored to suit the convenience of a party.

Adjective law ensures the effective enforcement of substantive rights through the orderly and speedy administration of justice.

Rules are not intended to hamper litigants or complicate litigation. But they help provide for a vital system of justice in which suitors may be heard in the correct form and manner, at the prescribed time in a peaceful, though adversarial, confrontation before a judge whose authority litigants acknowledge.

Public order and our system of justice are well served by a conscientious observance of the rules of procedure, particularly by government officials and agencies.” (United Pulp and Paper Co. Inc. vs. United Pulp and Paper Chapter-Federation of Free Workers, G.R. No. 141117, March 25, 2004 quoting previous decisions).

(September 3, 2005 issue)
Write letter to the editor. Click here.
Join the Sun.Star message board. Click here.




ENETWORK HEADLINE
SC won't stop impeachment

ENETWORK NEWS
Del Mar, others seek to defer expanded VAT
City prepares for JI bombers out to sow terror
Baguio loses status as tourists' favorite


[return to top] [home] [network page]


Sun.Star Network Online

LOCAL NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFESTYLE
FEATURE

SUPERBALITA
WEEKEND

Classified Power Ads

Past Issues



I © Copyright 2002 - 2005 Sun.Star Publishing, Inc. I Contact the website at onlinedeskatsunstardotcomdotph I