Back to homepage
| Bacolod | Baguio | Cagayan de Oro | Cebu | Davao | Dumaguete | General Santos | Iloilo | Manila | Pampanga | Pangasinan | Zamboanga |
 
 
 
 

Google
Web
www.sunstar.com.ph

  Local News
Cop ‘mauled me, stapled my ears’
Wife says he’s in Mindanao, bares terms for surfacing
Criminals ‘hurt Cebu image more’
Monday no-work holiday
Infra committee urges study on 3rd bridge
‘Massacre, not encounter’
Locals failed to help soldiers
60 firms victimized by fake permits syndicate
Taxi owners want P15 raise
Chiong not surprised by reports GMA will save Paco from death
9 inmates bolt youth facility
‘Massacre, not encounter’
Capitol defends fencing of area near bus terminal




Wednesday, November 23, 2005
Capitol defends fencing of area near bus terminal

The Cebu Provincial Government assailed the motion of the South Bus Terminal Homeowners’ Association for a “status quo” in the fencing of the property.

The Capitol, through provincial legal officer Marino Martinquilla, said the move was an exercise of the Capitol’s right as owner of the land.

The 3,000-square-meter property near the South Bus Terminal was fenced following a fire in the area last Nov. 5.

The homeowners, meanwhile, suspect the fire was “planned.” They filed a motion citing real estate administrator Paul Entera in contempt and asked the court for an injunctive writ to stop Capitol’s actions on the property.

“There is no question that the fire last Nov. 5 that razed to the ground the houses of the defendants was a fortuitous event, that it could not be blamed on the province of Cebu or Entera,” the province’s comment read.

The homeowners had argued that status quo should have been observed while the case for unlawful detainer remained to be resolved in court.

The Provincial Government filed the case against the homeowners in 2002. Fencing the property would be a violation of the status quo, the defendants said.

But the Capitol argued it is just exercising its “right as owner and lawful possessor of the subject parcel of land,” as provided for in Articles 429 and 430 of the Civil Code of the Philippines.

An injunctive writ is also “highly improper” for lack of urgent necessity, the Provincial Government said.

“Where is the damage that defendants sought to prevent that demands the injunctive relief? Clearly none, their houses are already non-existing,” the opposition read.

“There is really a need for additional space for a much-needed expansion of the terminal,” Gov. Gwendolyn Garcia earlier said. (JGA)

(November 23, 2005 issue)
Write letter to the editor. Click here.
Join the Sun.Star message board. Click here.




ENETWORK HEADLINE
Ex-poll official Garci back in Mindanao, wife says

ENETWORK NEWS
Cop 'mauled me, stapled my ears'
Terrorists out to bomb US embassy, metro: report
Rob suspect to file charges against Cebu police


[return to top] [home] [network page]


Sun.Star Network Online

LOCAL NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFESTYLE
FEATURE

SUPERBALITA
WEEKEND

Classified Power Ads

Past Issues



I © Copyright 2002 - 2005 Sun.Star Publishing, Inc. I Contact the website at onlinedeskatsunstardotcomdotph I