Back to homepage
| Bacolod | Baguio | Cagayan de Oro | Cebu | Davao | Dumaguete | General Santos | Iloilo | Manila | Pampanga | Pangasinan | Zamboanga |
 
 
 
 

Google
Web
www.sunstar.com.ph

  Opinion
Pooled editorial: More dreadful than ‘No-el’
Nalzaro: Sonny Osmeña’s advice
Wenceslao: A Fiesta Señor postscript
Malilong: We are cursed
Seares: Losing in the Sinulog
Carvajal: Cebu's dirty, foul-smelling underbelly
Speak out: Charter change rush: an act of greed
Speak out: Demolishing vendors' stalls
Speak out: SSS problem




Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Pooled editorial: More dreadful than ‘No-el’

... is the holding of elections with an electoral system still not capable
of producing honest and quick results

Many people dread, even hate, the cancellation of the next elections in 2007.

To most people, the elections represent more than exercise of a democratic process. They are a tool for cleansing, a device for correction, a means for hitting back. They supply payback time, when voter is king or comes close to being king.

That, despite flaws and inadequacies of Philippine-style elections.

No wonder then that surveys of popular opinion reject the proposal to cancel elections next year in preparation for changes in the Constitution and form of government.

Revulsion, outrage

“No-el” is plainly unacceptable to the greater number of Filipinos. And there are other reasons for the loathing.

One is revulsion to the idea that changes of political system benefit the power wielders who bring about those changes. Those are the mayors, governors, barangay captains, and other local officials whose contract of governance expires in 2007.

The other reason is outrage against the conspiracy to stop the issue of cheating in the last elections from being resolved, clearly benefitting those whose claim to power could be illegitimate. “No-el” tends to seduce local leaders and win their support against moves to unseat President Gloria Arroyo.

Same electoral system?

But think of holding elections with the same apparatus that produced the highly questionable balloting of 2004. Scary and sobering thought.

The same election officials who worked with then commissioner Virgilio Garcillano would still be there. The same defective and corrupt system that allowed politicians to plot victory with Comelec officials would still operate.

The same decrepit, slow, and cheating-prone Comelec would be arbiter of public will.

What can be done

Do we still want elections next year?

Yes, but not with the same system, equipment, and people.

Congress and the executive department can work together to make the changes in the election process within their competence and resources. Citizens can adopt stronger measures against election rigging and tampering.

Difficult moves, with so little time left, and the forces of evil entrenched and at work.

Yet still a better option than having no elections at all. (Sun.Star Cebu)


For Bisaya stories from Cebu. Click here.

(January 18, 2006 issue)
Write letter to the editor.Click here.
Join the Sun.Star message board.Click here.




ENETWORK HEADLINE
US rejects RP bid to have custody of 4 Marines

ENETWORK NEWS
Pinoy informer gets US$100,000 bounty in Zambo
SEA Games Cebu committee flayed for audit, gripes
32 American soldiers join Balikatan in N. Cotabato


[return to top] [home] [network page]


Sun.Star Network Online

LOCAL NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFESTYLE
FEATURE

SUPERBALITA
WEEKEND

Classified Power Ads

Past Issues



I © Copyright 2002 - 2005 Sun.Star Publishing, Inc. I Contact the website at onlinedeskatsunstardotcomdotph I