Monday, November 26, 2007 Reeves: Visa fraud and waivers By Robert L. Reeves
OBTAINING a visa at many US consulates can be very difficult, especially given the high percentage of visa denials.
A denial makes it more difficult to obtain a future visa. Many applicants who have been denied or fear denial, resort to using falsified information, such as an assumed name or falsifying marital status to obtain a visa to the United States (US). They usually submit false documents provided by or based on the advice and assistance of a travel agency. Some of these applicants successfully obtain a visa and travel to the US. While these individuals may have entered the US, they face serious consequences because of the fraudulent entry.
Section 212(a)(6)(c) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA) provides that any alien who, by fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact, seeks to procure (or has sought to procure or has procured) a visa, other documentation, or admission into the United States or other immigration benefits is inadmissible.
A finding of fraud under section 212(a)(6)(c) of the INA results in a lifetime bar for future immigration benefits such as a green card and the ability to petition family unless granted a waiver.
This fraud or willful misrepresentation of a material fact must be made to the US government by either an oral or a written statement. Using a different name to avoid being questioned about a previously-denied visa application is one example.
Even though the principal elements of fraud and willful misrepresentation are slightly different, the lifetime ban penalty for both is the same. A charge of fraud will be sustained if the alien knew of the falsity of the statement and intended to deceive the US government official. But, an accidental statement or misstatement due to an honest mistake is not considered to be a “willful” misrepresentation. Using a false name is one such example.
Materiality is another important element to trigger the bar. A determination of whether a misrepresentation is material requires a close analysis. A misrepresentation is material if the alien was inadmissible based on the true facts.
A misrepresentation that tends to shut off a line of inquiry relevant to the visa that might have resulted in the alien’s inadmissibility is considered to be material. For example, answering, “No,” to the question, “Have you ever been denied a visa before?” is a material misrepresentation if one has been denied.
A misrepresentation that does not tend to influence the government’s decision is not considered “material.” Also, the misrepresentation must be made with the subjective intent of obtaining immigration benefits, not for other reasons, such as fear or embarrassment. For example, an alien telling a consular officer that she has no children when in reality she has one child born out of wedlock may not be relevant to whether she qualifies for a visa.
There is a waiver to the lifetime ban for many committing fraud, such as entering under an assumed name. To obtain a waiver, the alien must prove that the denial of the green card would result in extreme hardship to a qualifying relative.
