Internet home of Philippine news
Back to homepage
| Bacolod | Baguio | Cagayan de Oro | Cebu | Davao | Dumaguete | General Santos | Iloilo | Manila | Pampanga | Pangasinan | Zamboanga |
 
online flower gift shop to Philippines
 
 
 

Google
Web
www.sunstar.com.ph

  Local News
Plan to impeach Puno hit
Guv, bodyguard hurt in ambush
Palace welcomes senators’ calls for political truce
Dela Paz to appeal expulsion from Valley golf club
4 robbers killed in shootout
Education chief rejects another review body
More benefits for cops pushed
MMDA defends pink-colored traffic signs

TigerDirect



Monday, January 12, 2009
MMDA defends pink-colored traffic signs

THE Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) said Sunday that it does not violate any international or local traffic code in using pink color for traffic signs.

“All of our programs are in accordance with local and international standards. We see nothing wrong with it,” said MMDA Chairman Bayani Fernando adding that motorists are also in favor of the pink-colored signages as this can be easily seen.

Arroyo Watch: Sun.Star blog on President Arroyo

Fernando said that the Vienna Convention cited by the lawmakers does not prohibit the use of colors other than white, yellow, red, black, blue, green, and orange as internationally accepted colors for traffic signs, markings, and traffic lights.

Earlier, Party-list Representatives Satur Ocampo and Teodoro Casiño of Bayan Muna, Liza Maza and Luzviminda Ilagan of Gabriela, and Rafael Mariano of Anakpawis asked Congress to investigate in aid of legislation the MMDA’s penchant for the pink signs and structures not only mar the urban landscape but also violate local and international traffic safety regulations.

They said that the pink color is not in accordance with the Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals, of which the Philippines is one of the signatories, which states the standard colors and sizes that should be used in road signs.

The MMDA signs, according to them, also go against Administrative Order 160-A titled "Specifying the Legal Grounds and Procedures for the Prohibition and abatement of Billboards and Signboards Constituting Public Nuisance or Other Violations of Law."

But Fernando insisted that the MMDA has not violated any law even as he turned the tables on the lawmakers calling them more of a “nuisance” than the agency.

“By definition, a public nuisance is defined as any act, omission, establishment of condition of property, or anything which annoys or offends the senses. Going by this definition, then it appears that our party-list lawmakers are public nuisance,” he said.

Instead of calling for a House probe, Fernando said the lawmakers should focus their work on coming up with legislation on how to improve traffic safety in the country.

Better, still he said for them to amend the Vienna Convention and institute whatever reforms or changes they have in mind.

“There is a very petty issue. They should just concentrate their energies on true public nuisance such as the graffiti and vandals posted by members of Left-leaning groups which are more a nuisance than our signs,” he said. (AH/Sunnex)

For more Philippine news, visit Sun.Star Pampanga.

(January 12, 2009 issue)
Write letter to the editor. Click here.




ENETWORK HEADLINE
3 cities, 12 towns in Misamis Oriental flooded
ENETWORK NEWS
Gov't is losing war vs drugs: group
Death penalty not lifted in Davao
Cebu bank remains stable


[return to top] [home] [network page]


Sun.Star Network Online

LOCAL NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFESTYLE
FEATURE

RSS FeedRSS Feed


Classified Power Ads

Past Issues

Western Union

I © Copyright 2007 Sun.Star Publishing, Inc. I Contact the website at sunnexatsunstardotcomdotph I