City Council aspirant Herrera embroiled in legal battle with business partners

TO LEGALLY address the “malicious and baseless” posts on social media, businessman and Cebu City Council aspirant

Ernesto “Ernest” Herrera II has filed a complaint for cyber libel against several individuals.

While this developed, two of the respondents of the case filed by Herrera also filed a criminal complaint against the latter over business disputes.

Lawyer Abraham Rey Acosta, legal counsel of Herrera said his client has particularly filed a complaint for violation of Section 4, paragraph (c)(4) of Republic Act 10175, or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 against spouses Richard and Janice Kintanar and spouses Ramon and Karla Fernandez.

The complaint stemmed from several Facebook posts and comments on various dates, which allegedly contains malicious imputations that malign, discredit, insult and assassinate the character and good reputation of Herrera.

“We filed a case for cyberlibel against these persons who are attempting to take over the management of Kambal Pandesal.

They have posted several outlandish, outrageous, baseless posts on Facebook to discredit my client and it just so happens

that my client is running for city councilor and by doing so, it is clear that they are maligning his reputation in relation to this case,” Acosta said.

Herrera lodged his complaint last Thursday, February 7.

In his complaint-affidavit, Herrera said that several posts and comments were made by Ramon Fernandez who is using Facebook account named Maxi Green, which even started last November 23.

Although he was not named, Herrera said the various posts and comments clearly shows that it pertains to him as it mentioned several facts which he is known for.

Some of the posts mentioned about his bakery outlet business named Kambal Pandesal, his being a former mayor of

Calape, Bohol, his initials as EH and his candidacy as Cebu City councilor.

Last Friday, February 8, spouses Kintanar also filed a criminal case against Herrera and his wife for violation of Article 310

in relation to Article 308 and Article 315 (1) (b) of the Revised Penal Code before the City Prosecutor Office in Danao City.

In a statement, spouses Kintanar said that since 2015, they have been partners with Herrera in running an outlet of Kambal

Pandesal bakery located inside Mitsumi branch in Danao City.

However, Acosta said Herrera is the sole proprietor of the bakery.

At the start of the alleged partnership business, spouses Kintanar claimed that they agreed that the business will be

solely named to Herrera so they can start the business immediately.

But it was only until November 2018 when the spouses Kintanar were contacted by the management of Kambal Pandesal because the business has unpaid supplies amounting to P800,000.

The spouses Kintanar also claimed that they get less of the 50 percent share of the income of the bakery every month.

On November 27, both parties met and a demand letter was executed by the spouses Kintanar on December 5 asking Herrera to pay his dues to the former.

“Clearly, the Herreras misappropriated the money as they converted part of the shares of the Kintanars for their own gain,” read the the spouses Kintanar’s statement.


SunStar website welcomes friendly debate, but comments posted on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the SunStar management and its affiliates. SunStar reserves the right to delete, reproduce or modify comments posted here without notice. Posts that are inappropriate will automatically be deleted.

Forum rules:

Do not use obscenity. Some words have been banned. Stick to the topic. Do not veer away from the discussion. Be coherent. Do not shout or use CAPITAL LETTERS!