Ombudsman junks case vs Oro mayor

(Photo from Oscar Moreno’s Facebook account)

THE Office of the Ombudsman has exonerated Cagayan de Oro City Mayor Oscar Moreno and former city treasurer Glenn Banez from criminal liability after it dismissed the controversial Ajinomoto Philippines tax settlement case.

The 13-page ruling received by the mayor on February 20, stated that Moreno and Banez, in entering a settlement agreement with the Ajinomoto, did not need authorization from the City Council.

In 2016, the Ombudsman found Mayor Moreno of having committed grave misconduct for this offense, and was also held liable for allowing Ajinomoto to pay P300,000 instead of its original local business tax deficiency of P2.9 million.

But the Ombudsman overturned its statement, saying that the agreement was not a new obligation and therefore did not need authority from the Sanggunian.

"Following the path of the documents and processes, it is undeniable that the source of obligation of the Agreement was the tax deficiency assessment levied by the City Government against Ajinomoto. The obligation contained therein was not a new obligation. It therefore did not need authority from the Sanggunian before it can be entered into. It was an old obligation that had an outstanding issue and continued to be the bone of contention between the two parties," the Ombudsman said.

The Ombudsman said its past resolution and order to charge Moreno failed to notice that Article 22 (c) of the Local Government is not an absolute rule.

The article 22 states that, "Unless otherwise provided in this Code, no contract may be entered into by the local chief executive in behalf of the local government unit without prior authorization by the Sanggunian concerned".

According to the Ombudsman, the clause "Unless otherwise provided in this Code," states that the same will not apply to other provisions, and does not follow that every agreement forged by the Treasurer should be approved by the Sanggunian.

The order was enacted on January 22, this year. It was penned by Assistant Special Prosecutor I Anthony Ludalvi Vista, and approved by Assistant Ombudsman-Ombudsman Proper Pilarita Lapitan and Ombudsman Samuel Martires himself.

In a press conference, Moreno said he feels vindicated and proves that justice remains. Moreno, who turns 68 today said, the ruling is a blessing.

"Looking back, I feel not just vindicated but very proud of the people, they stayed with us. The cases thrown against me has transformed my relationship with the people," he said.

"Mahadlok sila nga mo-succeed ako, they will be reduced to irrelevance, they will be reduced to the sidelines. Usa raman na sila ka grupo ang nagpaluyo ani, sila Guiliani, Nunez, Akut, kang Dongkoy (former mayor Vicente Emano) ug Bambi (Governor Yevgeny Vicente Emano) na sila, they are the dogs of war of Dongkoy and Bambi," he said.

Lawyer Dale Mordeno, Moreno's lawyer said the Ajinomoto case has finally reached to an end, first, the administrative aspect of the case was dismissed in 2017, and now, the criminal aspect was also junked.

Mordeno said this ruling is the result of the motion to reopen the case they filed last year. He said they used the same arguments they applied in Moreno's administrative case.

Moreno meanwhile said the Ajinomoto's tax deficiency was actually a mistake of his predecessor, former mayor Vicente Emano, who wrongly classified the condiment company to essential, instead of being a non-essential.

"Ila ng sayop. They city lost P2.9 million during their time kay it was classified as essential then. Ako dapat ang mo-complain sa ilang sayop pero ilang gipasa sa ako, ilang gitabonan ilang sayop," the mayor said.

Moreno's accuser William Guialani said the Ombudsman may have dismissed the criminal aspect of the case but for him it will not affect the administrative side which is still at the Supreme Court.

"Hindi pa tapos ang laban. Lahi ang criminal ug ang administrative nga aspect. Dili niya pwede magamit ang dismissal sa criminal aspect sa administrative kay separate cause of action mani," Guialani said.

Guialani said he is not interested to appeal the ombudsman's decision as he is resolved that Moreno did not commit a crime when the city government settled and allowed Ajinomoto to pay only an amount of P300,000 instead of the original local business tax deficiency of P2.9 million.

The former barangay Taglimao village chief, however, said Moreno may likely not be able to get away with the administrative aspect for not asking authority from the city council when the tax settlement was made.

"Naay balaod sa local government code nga walay transaction or negotiation sa syudad without the authority from the city council. In the absence of the authority from the city council, it is tantamount to abuse of authority," Guialani said.

Guialani also said he is not interested to have Moreno imprisoned but he instead want the mayor unseated.

Guialani is now waiting the high court's ruling on the administrative aspect. He elevated the administrative case at the Supreme Court after he lost his case at the Court of Appeals.


SunStar website welcomes friendly debate, but comments posted on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the SunStar management and its affiliates. SunStar reserves the right to delete, reproduce or modify comments posted here without notice. Posts that are inappropriate will automatically be deleted.

Forum rules:

Do not use obscenity. Some words have been banned. Stick to the topic. Do not veer away from the discussion. Be coherent. Do not shout or use CAPITAL LETTERS!