SECTIONS
Wednesday, June 19, 2019
MANILA

CA insists Rappler not fully Filipino-owned

Photo from Court of Appeals website

ONLINE media outfit Rappler has violated the 1987 Constitution, as it was not fully-owned by Filipinos, the Court of Appeals (CA) said in its February 21 ruling.

The appellate court's decision came after it junked the motion for consideration filed by Rappler, denying the news website's plea to overturn the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that revoked its certification of registration for alleged violation of ownership restrictions.

The CA junked Rappler's motion for reconsideration, maintaining that the latter is not 100 percent owned by Filipinos.

The CA also found that Rappler's plea lacks merit, since the online news outfit failed to raise new argument.

"The arguments raised by petitioners are essentially the same as those that have already been discussed and were exhaustively passed upon in this Court's decision," the CA decision read.

"A motion for reconsideration grounded on arguments already submitted to the court and found to be without merit may be denied summarily, as it would be a useless ritual for this Court to reiterate itself," it added.

The SEC on January 11, 2018 revoked the Rappler's certification of incorporation for allegedly violating the 1987 Constitution when it accepted more than $1 million worth of donations from Omidyar Network of eBay founder Pierre Omidyar.

Under Section 11(1), Article 16 of the 1987 Constitution, the ownership and management of mass media "shall be limited to citizens of the Philippines, or to corporations, cooperatives or associations, wholly-owned and managed by such citizens."

On July 26, 2018, the CA's Special 12th Division affirmed the SEC's finding that Rappler violated the constitutional requirement for the ownership and control of mass media entities.

The court, in its ruling, stressed: "The grant of control to a foreign entity over mass media entity, regardless of the actual exercise of such foreign control, is already considered a violation."

Following the CA's decision to uphold SEC's move to revoke Rappler's license to operate, Malacañang on Monday, March 11, said it would let the legal process run its course.

In a press conference with Palace reporters, Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo said the executive branch would not interfere in the affairs of the judiciary, its co-equal branch.

"As we said, any case that has been filed before the courts, we will not interfere. We will let the law takes its course," the Palace official said.

Panelo also reiterated that Rappler's case was not an affront to press freedom.

"Definitely [not an attack on press freedom]. It’s not related. Ever since. Hindi naman talaga related (It's not related to press freedom, ever since)," he said. (SunStar Philippines)


VIEW COMMENTS
DISCLAIMER:

SunStar website welcomes friendly debate, but comments posted on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the SunStar management and its affiliates. SunStar reserves the right to delete, reproduce or modify comments posted here without notice. Posts that are inappropriate will automatically be deleted.


Forum rules:

Do not use obscenity. Some words have been banned. Stick to the topic. Do not veer away from the discussion. Be coherent. Do not shout or use CAPITAL LETTERS!

sunstar.com.ph