By Efamae Arnejo, Cebu Normal University Main Campus
Pax Silica is a US-led international economic security association that creates secure global chains for artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and coalitions formed with China’s strength and in the tech manufacturing league, particularly in fabricating the computation of components and chips. Furthermore, the US intends to create a global supply chain for AI and semiconductors. The Philippines is among the 24 countries petitioners in this agreement. With this kind of matter, is it even worth risking the country just to align with Artificial Intelligence, knowing that the Philippines continues to suffer from many pressing problems?
With the government’s proposed initiative, the Philippines is envisioned to strengthen its aspect in the global artificial intelligence and semiconductor industry. Nonetheless, the future should not come at the expense of addressing the country’s more pressing economic, environmental and social obstacles. According to PBBM, “The Pax Silica industrial hub will create an ecosystem that will have AI at its core. It will bring quality jobs to our people, accelerate industrial competitiveness and revitalize our economy as a street.” These advantages feature the country’s progression throughout the manufacturing process of the institution. Firstly, the industrial economy in the security zone in New Clark City, Tarlac -- enabling the local economy and boosting industrial aggression. Secondly, the nation will transition from merely exporting raw materials such as nickel and copper to engaging in advanced production, mineral processing and technology incorporation.
However, building this kind of establishment neglects the importance of the environment and the ecological community -- harming society and its people. This manufacturing process requires a lot of water to cool AI and tech hubs, creating a risk of diminishing water supplies and straining regional watersheds. Secondly, energy demand threatens to spike local electricity rates and strain regional energy grids. Lastly, the land and ecosystems that will be developed in areas like New Clark City raise worries about habitat disturbances and community displacement. Instead of promoting sustainable progress, these developments could threaten people’s livelihoods, damage the environment and put essential natural resources, especially water, at risk.
There are many pressing issues that the Philippines must address and resolve before prioritizing large-scale AI initiatives. Many people believe that while society can live without artificial intelligence, it cannot survive without clean water. This statement highlights the importance of protecting the country’s essential resources over pursuing rapid technological advancement. Although AI may make certain tasks faster and more efficient, it cannot replace human understanding, judgment, compassion and critical thinking. Technology should serve the people — not come at the expense of their basic needs, welfare and the environment.
Therefore, risking the country’s resources and environmental stability just to align with artificial intelligence is not a decision that should be taken lightly. While AI and semiconductor development may offer economic opportunities, these benefits should not come at the cost of the Philippines’ water supply, ecosystems and the welfare of its people. A country cannot achieve true progress by prioritizing advanced technology while leaving behind the basic needs of its citizens. The Philippines must first strengthen its foundations by addressing poverty, environmental concerns and social challenges before fully embracing an industry that demands significant resources. Artificial intelligence may shape the future, but the future of the Philippines must be built around protecting its people and preserving the resources they depend on.
