Local News

CCCI: No road widening, no BRT

Sunnexdesk

THE Cebu Chamber of Commerce and Industry (CCCI) is against canceling the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project and reiterated its stand that Cebu needs an intermodal mass transport system to address the needs of a growing community.

In a statement sent Monday, April 23, CCCI cited Cebu's need for a mass transport system, saying traffic congestion has affected "all sectors of society."

"It took more than 10 years for the BRT to go through its approval process, not to mention countless time and resources spent in the process," the business organization said.

With economists computing a 53 percent economic internal rate of return, the chamber said the project's benefits are clear and that the "project is ready to take off."

The chamber also said that road widening along the BRT routes should be an integral component of the project.

It acknowledged that the BRT is a short-term solution that is ready for implementation and that a light rail transit (LRT) will benefit a bigger volume of commuters over a wider area and that this should also be actively pursued and implemented "within the shortest possible time" to support Cebu's growing economy.

"LRT and BRT will complement each other," the chamber said.

"Cebu is in a crisis situation. Cebu Chamber would like to enjoin all sectors of society to set aside political differences and work together to solve the traffic problems in order to achieve our common desire to have a Cebu where quality family life and business shall flourish," the statement said. (MEA/SunStar Cebu)

Tinago Barangay Hall, shown here on May 2, 2024, received a “Notice of Violation” from Cebu City’s Task Force Gubat sa Baha for the concrete wall behind it that lies within the three-meter easement zone of the Estero de Parian. /

Anti-flood Task Force targets gov’t offices

City sports center revamp 50% done as Palaro looms

DOH: Delayed Covid allowances ‘underway’

Cedric Lee, Deniece Cornejo ‘guilty’ in Vhong Navarro illegal detention for ransom case

HIV ‘not a legal ground’ to terminate employees